by Brett Rutherford
Christopher Nolan’s film is a triumph, a milestone in the
history of ancient-world epics.
A translator of The Odyssey (Emily Wilson), whose work Nolan admired and claimed as an inspiration, has condemned the script and the acting in rather insulting terms, even as interest in the film is driving the sales of her translation up into Harry Potter land.
The slug-like creature known as Elon Mollusk has offered to
make his own AI-generated version of The Odyssey, suggesting that Mel Gibson
might direct it. All to correct the supposed DEI and “woke” components of the
script and casting.
I am myself a captive creature of the classics, having
adapted a number of classic Greek poets, and having authored a long poem that
is a prequel to The Iliad. I have read various English translations of
both epics, and I prefer Lattimore for The Iliad and Fitzgerald for The
Odyssey. A peek at Wilson’s translation did not stir me. Therefore I offer
the following disconnected comments about The Odyssey from a vantage of great
familiarity with the literature and its tradition.
Surprise! I was thrilled and delighted with Nolan’s film.
It is not a linear or literal adaptation of Homer’s poem. Even
compressed, that would take maybe 24 hours, or a mini-series running three seasons.
What this film offers instead is the heart of The Odyssey’s plot and many of
its characters, as re-purposed and re-imagined by a film-maker with a brain of
his own, and many points to make about our present-day world, and our own nation’s
obsession with war.
The swash-buckling hero of the sword-and-sandal films, this
Odysseus is not. He is a war veteran with PTSD, memory loss, drug addiction,
and a dread of going home where a line of widows and orphans would meet him on
the dock and demand to know what happened to their sons and brothers. For that,
he has no answer. He has lost every single man, some in battle at Troy, and the
rest in calamities on the war home.
In several flashbacks to the fall of Troy, Odysseus is seen
as becoming a passive observer of the carnage his clever invention of the Trojan
Horse has brought upon the fallen city. He sees women and children cut down in
the streets. The King of Kings of the Greeks, Agamemnon, passes through the
gates of Troy in the guise of Darth Vader.
There are no gods in this film. The “Athena” who keeps
appearing to counsel him is not the goddess, but one of his shell-shock
hallucinations. She is, in fact, an apparition of a priestess of Athena he saw
beheaded at Troy. You might have to see the film twice to realize this.
There are monsters in this film, oh yes. A terrific Cyclops
who devours humans head first in a direct imitation of the Goya painting Saturn
Devouring His Children. The witch Circe is a man-hater, turning
house-guests into pigs until she is persuaded by Odysseus to change her ways
(the year of sex between witch and warrior are omitted). The whirlpool and
hydra-like monster, and the giants, are the stuff of nightmares, and Nolan, not
employing AI in any way, uses full size models and various tricks of
photography to pull of the remarkable episodes.
Now here I want to digress about these monster stories. The Odyssey
begins in “Homer’s” voice, as an omniscient narrator, but all the stories of
the mishaps involving enchantresses and monsters, are related by Odysseus himself
while he is a guest at dinner. They are table talk bardic episodes. The places
and creatures did not exist, and no Greek had ever seen a Cyclops. Odysseus is
a cunning man, a trickster, and perhaps a desperate liar because he cannot in
any other way account for the loss of his men. None of them, not one, returned
from Troy.
The reason I dwell on this is that Nolan gives us Odysseus’s
most outlandish tall tale, that of his and his crew’s journey to Hades, through
a mysterious “back door” far to the North (Iceland, it seems.) This scene
reduced me to rubble. It is unsettling and terrifying, especially to a poet.
Nolan has Odysseus and his men make a hasty retreat from
Hades, pursued by the shades of the unburied dead of Ithica. In Homer’s original
tall-tale, Odysseus
meets more and more famous Greeks going back to the earliest times. He never
explains how he recognizes all these ghosts as they approach him to talk, and
he stops himself and apologizes to his host. He has overstepped the human and is on over his depth.
What I believe Nolan has perceived, correctly, is that
Odysseus has lied his way home, a broken man, and that, once in Ithaca he would
have only his tall tales to justify his long absence. Nolan has the hero relate
each of these “tales” to Calypso as recovered memories. Which cannot be
trusted.
Odysseus’s flashback to Troy is his Oppenheimer moment.
Nolan has worked the whole story to bring us here. It is not about ancient
Greeks. It is about us. It is about every broken-down veteran in a doorway. It
is about the soldier asked to go through the gates of a strange city and kill
on sight. It is about the invention of monsters where none exist.
This is a masterpiece of cinema. A masterpiece of story-telling. An experience that will linger for years in the minds of viewers.
I am sorry that classicists are offended. I am sorry that
Greeks are offended, claiming that a universal classic belonging to all
humankind can be "culturally appropriated" – rubbish!
I am sorry that the film did not have a more high-toned
script with more literary language. I did not like Telemachus call his father his
“Dad.” That was the director’s choice.
I am sorry that most audiences will not have the context to
understand why the Trojan War started, what preceded the fall of Troy, and,
hence its effect on those who sacked it. The Odyssey is a sequel, the greatest
sequel ever. The violation of hospitality when a prince of Troy stole Helen,
the wife of Menelaus, triggered the ten-year siege.
Hades, soon enough, will be full of critics quarreling over Nolan’s
Odyssey. The food down there consists mostly of sour cherries, which should suit them.




