Saturday, July 6, 2024

Moscow Was Burned, So Why Not Paris?


 

by Brett Rutherford

Adapted from Victor Hugo, l'Annee Terrible, "May 1871 - Paris in Flames"

The Terror is here again. How far will it go?
How far will you descend
     into the depths of murder?
Someone suggested, “Like Moscow.”
Another grimaced and said, “Why not?”
The depth of crime, both
     frightening and stupid!
All in a sweep, annihilate
the present and all the past.
In this city that sums up Athens,
Rome, and Tyre, take torch
to the Agora and its portico
where the gods and heroes are painted;
the Forum, too — set history ablaze!

Bring an entire people to the stake
and consume them as a single martyr.
Banishing the ever-rising sun
in favor of unending night,
change Europe into the desolation
of barbarous Asia, because some fool,
some Russian blockhead, that bear
who went by the name Rostropchine,
deprived Napoleon of the wooden ark
of Moscow (a chock-a-block collection
of tinder-box homes and palaces)
by stealth and arson. What idiot proposed
“That was a good trick, burning Moscow,
     so why not Paris?”

Because Russia loved her servitude,
because she wanted, turning her capital
into an ash-heap, to foil Bonaparte
to retain the slavish court of Alexander;
because that wicked deed brought a smile
to the Tsar on his distant sofa,
with one eye fixed on the golden cross,
heir indeed of Ivan the Terrible,
this barbarian eluded history
through an unthinkable crime.
So now star-studded France must fall
into the same abyss of wanton arson!

But you, through whom the rights
     of the people are betrayed,
you attain a crime
     while losing the nation!
Who called the Russian mayor great
    heaps praise on a Hun.
This Rostropchin is swollen up
     with a savage grandeur,
self-pride, the tiny possession
of a pitiable slave, and this man,
with torch in hand, harks back
to where the human race is unknown.
He came from old, black-hearted Scythians,
or ancient Gepidus, beyond the pale.
He is fierce, sublime, and stupid.
We know what he did, but not
what in his small brain,
     he intended.
If he were only a ghost,
     he might seem heroic,
rattling his chains by night.

At the summit of all the centuries
there were four dark flames —
one where the vile king of infamous
glories shines to a bugled anthem,
the Goths who all but destroyed Ephesus;
another where Umar, the son of Tamerlane,
made ashes of Baghdad, Delhi, Damascus;
the flame usnpeakable that Nero hymned;
add to them now, flamboyant,
a lesser light by far, Rostropchine’s folly.
But you, who have free will and choice —
is this the company you desire to keep?

I see the way, inclining your head,
you turn your attention to Paris. Why?

To light yet another pyre?
To see it melt away like winter snow?
Is there no difference to you between
a city that serves, and one that opposes you?

Russia had might as well have been a desert,
Moscow its sinister Babel, a den where reason
limped along with a French accent, where truth
was an object of suspicion and arrest,
the citadel of rotten boyars and monks,
so fiercely backward that no progress
could ever dwell there, a nest of raptors
from which Peter, a vulture, flew away.

 

There’s no comparing the two:
     Moscow in Asia, sad relic at best,
     Paris, in and of all Europe, the future!

Would you take the same cheap shroud
     one would allow an enemy
and wrap us up with in in a common tomb?

If Moscow vanishes, the world weeps,
     a sad cloud, passing by,
but in the end of Paris, a shadow
     extends to engulf the world.

Without a compass, the whole ship sinks.
Progress becomes a dullard and loses its way.

Put out the human race’s one great eye,
     this Cyclops stumbles blind;
unlit by the lamp of possible facts,
it gropes and strikes out randomly,
with terrible cries that are not even words.

Language will collapse to random syllables,
words to the phonemes within them,
then nothing but howling vowels,
as of the slope it slides downward,
less than a beast, into the unknown.

Footnote: Fyodor Rostopchin (1763-1826) was governor-general of Moscow during Napoleon I’s invasion. After the Battle of Borodino, half the population of Moscow fled. Rostopchin had the remainder of the population evacuated, including all city officials, leaving behind foreigners. When Napoleon arrived with his army, no one greeted him. Rostopchin had concealed policemen with orders to burn the city to the ground. Fire engines were disassembled and fuses were concealed around the city to accelerate fires. There is no agreement among historians about whether the fires were deliberately set, as any everyday accidental fire would have spread unchecked once the city’s fire services were absent. In the closely-packed city, entirely constructed of wood, a catastrophe might have been inevitable. Rostopchin, in later years, claimed innocence, but later confessed that he had ordered Moscow’s destruction.

Footnote for Russian blockhead: “Rostopcha” means scatter-brain or block-head in Russian.

 

Another footnote: Rostopchin claimed descent from the Tatars, in the family line of Genghis Khan.





 

 

Monday, June 17, 2024

Making Puppies

by Brett Rutherford

Banned from our basement
chemistry lab, we boys
huddled to wait
until whatever it was
going on the dark
was over with.
 
Mrs. Avampato
wants puppies, we are told.
Her dog is in there,
thrust in the dark.
Another dog after,
hurled in, confused
and barking.
 
Wise as we are
beyond our twelve years,
able to make those jars
of rocket fuel, adept
at double decomposition,
stink bombs and smoke,
we have no idea what
is supposed to happen
in the dank dark
beneath our workbench
and its condensers
and retorts. Faust
offers no answer,
nor does my reading
in ancient alchemy.
 
Eight small feet run
this way and that.
There is much barking.
Then, a loud whine.
"Ma! He's hurting her!"
Sonny shouts up
to the women above.
"I'm going in!"
 
"Don't you dare!"
Mrs Avampato calls back.
"No one is allowed
to see! Just mind
your own business!"
 
The whining abates,
then all we hear
is the extended pant
of two canines.
 
Who knew
that if you wanted puppies
two dogs in the dark
would find a way?
 

Tuesday, June 11, 2024

Look Away

by Brett Rutherford

I escaped from one of those.
It was the worst day of my life;
I nearly smothered.
 
If one presents itself,
I turn away with a shudder.
Who in his right mind
would go in there?

Monday, June 10, 2024

The Frailty of History

 by Brett Rutherford

Adapted from Victor Hugo, l”Année Terrible, “May 1871”

 

The centuries belong to the people,
and yet each moment they possess
the people can snatch away.
Relentlessly they tear bits
from History, a struggle strange
and self-defeating. If deeds and facts
hang on a tree for all to regard,
one comes along to trim a branch;
another follows, and with a noise
a whole millennium comes crashing down.
No, matter, they say: the trunk
of a bare tree tells a better story.

 

Like this, the shards of brass are pried
from our Roman column; like that,
fragments of marble are hammered off
from the proud arch of memory.
Names and dates, faces and arms
fall to the ground as rubble.

What would they say of Venice
if Saint Marks’ drove away its lions?

 

Now at the deathbed of glory,
sits History, an enfeebled nurse,
embaring her arms to show her scars.
Perhaps, expiring, poor Glory sighs,
“Whatever one thinks of France —
      of the France that we once knew —
looking out at this tough army,
     this ever-proud people,
taking in all that in this century
     I, in its third glory, had dreamed of,
     the good we wished for and strove
            to make happen —
oh, this was illustrious!”

 

So why with hammer and petrol
     do you come to erase the past?

What have you done else for the suffering,
     for the shattered workers?
Have you shut down the penal colonies?
Oh, chronicles will be shorter now,
an easier task for the lecturers:
but give me the names
     of all those new schools you opened —
          I’ll wait for your reply.

Out in the streets, mobs come to destroy
all record of Marengo, Lodi,
     Wagram, and Arcole;
along the way did they make pause
to establish universal love? I thought not.

 

Does the man who was starving a year ago
now have a roof above him,
a hearth, a loaf of bread, some salt?
Have we honored the renunciation of war
by indulging in mad and sinister bloodshed?

Have the laws been re-done
     in the image of what is right?

Did I somehow miss the grand opening
of the new temple where clarity distills
into reason, and the result is freedom?

 

Has the child a right to school,
     the woman the right of her own person?
Have the acorns of the tree of truth
     been planted in men,
so as it grows within them, they
grow stronger and less prone to error?
Has the slow train of Progress
resumed on its narrow track,
from which new branches grow ever out?

 

No! Just ruins. Nothing. And so it is.
And as for me, I truly doubt
the murmuring people will be satisfied
when you protest: “Don’t look at this!
Don’t trouble yourselves with misery.
We don’t accomplish much, but what a show
we make of demolition!”

 

Wednesday, June 5, 2024

By the Number

by Brett Rutherford

knocked down to size
by thirty-four verdicts,
what shall we call him?
 
not forty-five,
those numerals kerned
into a near swastika,
 
not even the ever-
diminishing length
of what, to him,
meant "huge"
 
now he's just two,
the number,
child's signal
of toilet urge
 
and then just one,
an amorphous heap
of tangerine excrement

The Two Monuments, Part 2


 

The second part of Victor Hugo's protest against plans by The Paris Commune to destroy the Arc de Triomphe and the Napoleon column at the Place Vendome. (The column was toppled, but the Commune, unknown to the poet, chose to defend the Arch by placing cannons on top of it.)

by Brett Rutherford

Adapted from Victor Hugo, l’Annee Terrible, “May 1871”

2

O fratricide! For brother to kill brother
there must seem to be two sides. Is it
to be the arch against the column?

Must one stand, then, and the other fall?

We live in strangely sinister times,
a hammered hand smashing here,
and the whirling shell that falls from above.

 

But this is still France! For what, fellow citizens,
this overturning tumult, while an enemy
remains standing on the black horizons!

The great France is here! What does this little
Bonaparte matter when all is said and done?

Do we see a king when we think about Sparta?

Take away this latest Napoleon,
     and just like that, the people reappear.

One tree cut down, the forest makes new oaks.

 

Read the bronze plates’ ekphrastic tale,
follow the column’s spirals up and around:
great fighters crowd there in bas-relief,
filling the fields, the towers, the admiral’s boats,
dare over wall and bridge, wade ditch, wild
rivers ford, arms high in evil marshes,
all these are France in the assault for progress.

Justice! Take Caesar from his place if you will,
but put there the glory of Rome’s Republic
that is the dream behind our dream.

 

Put at this summit a people and not a man;
condense into a statue at the top of the pillar
the crowded people who live in this Paris,
knight, avenger of rights, conquering ferocious lies!

May the colossus tower here, and laugh
at the bullets’ laughing ricochet.

 

Make this statue of such pure alloy
that we no longer think vague or fatal thoughts;
embody the crowd, and embody the elite;
and may this giant fashioned after them,
provoke like a pillar-monk the distant ideal;
may it light the way, self-lit by the star
on his own forehead, the glint of sun
from the sword he always holds in ready.

 

On both monuments, the soldiers strive
like giants in some Titanic struggle.
Nothing matched their size and power.
As sculpted on the Arc de Triomphe,
the Revolution rumbles in their hundred battles.
War-crying Marseillaise stands petrified,
a fearsome spirit from the old, darkened world,
with the open-mouth call that never fades.
Both monuments sing in accord: “Deliverance!”

 

Why do I see this horror even when my eyes are closed?
Someone is coming! Tell me it is not our own hands
that do this? I am pulled onward by surging crowds.
The throw themselves against the double monuments!
This double-trophy the Teutons envied, surged now
with raised clubs and petrol-laden torches. Someone
is coming, with hammers and black powder. Blows
once aimed at soldiers now strike at statuary.
The glory of human art and beauty cracks apart.
We break it from above, we break it from below.
Cries echo from the Arch to the Column. It falls!
It resists! More powder! A battering ram! A bomb!

While all this goes on, the Prussians are watching;
oh, they are witnessing this, as they hold the sword
that was surrendered to them, their trophy, our shame!

 

These are the ones who make others carry crosses.
We shudder when Reichshoffen[6] is mentioned
     as though that could erase Wagram.[7]

Marengo’s glory fades out[8]
     before the shame of Waterloo.

The page of disaster overlays in lurid hues
the faded newsprint of former triumphs;
the blood-stained soiled thing outlives
the thing that shone resplendent once.

To assume we approve of Forbach’s loss,[9]

one must pretend we never won at Jena.[10]

These pygmy Emperors today;
     in the past, one giant.

And now, insult upon our injury,
I hear that MacMahon[11] and his cannons
have fired from afar upon the Arch,
a rain of lead and fire and iron!

 

Shame, then, to have a German flag fold out
above our heads; Sedan, not Austerlitz.
Where are the long-gone warriors? Have you
no madhouses, France, no asylums to empty
of elders and lunatics with rusty sabers
ready to sally forth to terrify old nemeses,
Brunswick, Cobourg, or de Bouillé?[12]

Must the graves open to yield us up
some veterans of the better wars?
To whom can we turn
if we wish to see again a vanished dawn?

 

Imagine, after a never-tiring life,
breaking the blockade of ancient evil,
to be expelled from history just like that;
a finger snapped, and they are gone, they
who held out against Popes and kings,
daring the black shadows of banishment
     and excommunication,
enduring capture and prison, assured
from within of their ultimate success; they,
the victorious fathers, banished by whom?
By us, their vanquished sons!

Alas! after such misery, this final blow,
amid the two bleeding ulcers we call peace’
after the vain fights of Avron, Bourget, and l”Haÿ!
After letting Strasbourg burn,
    and after the betrayal of Paris!
Is France not close enough to death?
If an enemy had done this to us, if Prussia,
accustomed to its savage pride, black flags
in keeping with black weather, its heels
upon the neck of Paris had said,
“We want to cancel all your past.
Frenchmen, these two proud monuments
annoy us, this pilaster of brass, this arch
of stone that survived our cannoning.
We want a scaffold where the pillar stood.
We want to see the blasted arch gone.
So do us the favor, will you?
    Demolish one, machine-gun the other.
Consider that an order. Let it be done!”

If Prussia had ordered this, o, fury!
What would our answer have been?
Let’s suffer! Let’s fight! This is too much!
Rather would be die a hundred times!
Our death will be our celebration.

We would have said, “Never! Never!”

And now we go and do it, unasked.



[1] Tagus to Elbe. From Portugal to Germany.

[2] Nile to Adige. From Egypt to northern Italy. The two map allusions suggest a comparison of Napoleonic Europe to the Roman Empire.

[3] Battle of Austerlitz, 1809.

[4] Versailles … Paris. The National forces based in Versailles were called the “Versaillais,” as opposed to the National Guard militias under the control of the Paris Commune.

[5] Carybdis and Scylla. Greek mythological monsters associated with dangerous rocks on both sides of a narrow channel.

[6] Reichshoffen. The Battle of Reichshoffen, also known as The Battle of Worth, 5 August 1870, was a decisive Prussian victory over Napoleon III’s French army.

[7] Wagram. In the Battle of Wagram, 5-6 July 1809, Napoleon I’s forces defeated the Austrian Empire.

[8] In the Battle of Marengo, 14 June 1800, the forces under First Consul Napoleon Bonaparte drove the Austrians out of Italy.

[9] The Battle of Forbach, 4-6 August 1870 led to Forbach being folded into the ceded provinces of Alsace and Lorraine.

[10] The Battle of Jena, 14 October 1806, was Napoleon I’s crushing and unexpected victory over the Prussian army.

[11] Marie Edme Patrice Maurice de MacMahon (1808-1893), the failed leader of Napoleon III’s army, placed in charge of the Versailles forces against the Commune. He would serve later as French President.

[12] Three enemies of Napoleon I and the French Revolution in general: Frederick William, Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, an ally of the Duke of Wellington against Napoleon; Prince Ferdinand Saxe-Coburg (1785-1851), commander-in-chief of the Austrian forces on the continent; and François-Claude Bouillé (1739-1800), a royalist general who opposed the French Revolution.